Fig xA Experimental data on bubble velocity in the

Fig. 7. Comparison of bubble velocity between experiment and calculation by drift flux model with Kawahara et al.’s distribution parameter for 3-pyr-Cytisine test channel with σA = 0.51. (a) Upstream channel (b) Downstream channel.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide
Fig. 8. Comparison of bubble velocity between experimental data and numerical data by simulation with VOF method.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide
Fig. 9. Comparison of bubble shape between experiments and numerical results by VOF method (Nitrogen – HFE-7200 two-phase flows in the net secondary productivity (NSP) test channel with contraction of σA = 0.35.) (a) jL,d = 0.43 m/s, jG,d = 0.27 m/s (b) jL,d = 0.43 m/s, jG,d = 0.67 m/s.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide
Fig. 10. Dimensionless bubble length data plotted against gas–liquid volume flow rate ratio. (a) Upstream channel (b) Downstream channel.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide