Nanofiltration performance Membrane selection of nanofiltration process

3.2. Nanofiltration performance
3.2.1. Membrane selection of nanofiltration process
Table 3.
Solute rejection and R-406 average permeate flux for different NF membrane.IndexNFMNanomax95NFXNF90DFA III rejection (%)59.484.998.799.1Average permeate flux (L/(m2h))4.482.953.853.24Full-size tableTable optionsView in workspaceDownload as CSV
Fig. 6. Deoinized water permeability decrease with DFA III concentration = 40% for different NF membranes. TMP = 1 bar, stirring speed = 300 rpm. Results are amniote egg mean values of at least two replicates. Standard deviation did not exceed 2% of the recorded values.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide
3.2.2. Concentration of EMR permeate by NF performance
Fig. 7. Effects of DFA III rejection and water flux on TMP for NF membrane. NF membrane 150 Da, 50 °C, 300 rpm. Results are mean values of at least two replicates. Standard deviation did not exceed 2% of the recorded values.Figure optionsDownload full-size imageDownload as PowerPoint slide