'If the Flood were local, God might have frequently broken His promise not to send this kind of Flood again. There have been huge 'local' floods in recent times: in Bangladesh, for instance, where 80% of the country has been overwhelmed, or Europe in 2002.'( Footnote 1)
Will there be any truth to thi...
One of the common statements by young earth creationists is that if Noah's Flood were a local flood, then God has broken his promise many times. According to The Book, page 10,
'If the Flood were local, God would have frequently broken His promise never to deliver such a Flood again. There have been large 'local' floods in recent times: in Bangladesh, for example, where 80% of this country has been inundated, or Europe in 2002.'( Footnote 1)
Can there be any truth to this claim? Do the area floods we see to-day constitute a breaking of the covenant God made with Noah? First, let's see the covenant in Genesis 9:8-15. If you think anything at all, you will likely wish to learn about go there.
8 Then God spoke to Noah and to his daughters with him, saying,
9 'Now see, I Myself do create My covenant with you, and with your descendants after you;
10 and with every living creature that's with you, the birds, the cattle, and every beast of the earth with you; of all that comes out of the ark, also every beast of the earth.
11 And I create My covenant with you; and all flesh shall never again be turn off by the water of the flood, neither shall there again be a flood to destroy the earth.
12 And God said, This is the sign of the agreement which I'm building between Me and you and every living creature that's with you, for several successive generations;
13 I set My bow in the cloud, and it will probably be for a sign of a covenant between Me and the-earth.
14 And it shall occur, when I bring a cloud over the earth, that the bow shall be viewed in the cloud,
15 and I'll remember My covenant, which is between Me and you and every living creature of all flesh; and never again should the water turn into a flood to destroy all flesh.'
To answer this question, one should examine exactly what the agreement says. First, who's the covenant with? This is contained in verses 9-10. Get supplementary resources on our related site by visiting guide to milwaukeewaterdamageexperts.com/commercial. Demonstrably, it had been made out of Noah and his sons, and their descendents. It was also built with every living creature that's with Noah. By the end of line 10, God extends it to 'also every creature of the planet earth.' There's no question who the agreement is with, nevertheless it is interesting that God makes a distinction between the living creatures with Noah (with every living creature that's with you), and the rest of the creatures (even every beast of the earth). Why would God make this distinction? If all the animals were killed, and Noah had all the survivors on the ark, then it was useless to give the agreement beyond the ark's people. This indicates that the flood was local, and there were animal numbers outside the inhabitants of the ark. If every living thing were on the ark, the expression 'also every beast of the earth' offers no additional meaning to the text.