How to figure out the stock portfolio of blowing providers for XPS production

In my own previous how to we talked about how to configure your XPS creation line. Today, I am going to let you know something about how exactly to figure out the portfolio from the blowing brokers for XPS production. I am going to discuss from 4 factors, local regulation, source availability, regional insulation regular, and technical issues.

First of all, local regulation, probably the most well-known blowing agent of XPS is Freon, some halocarbon including CFCs, HFCs and hcfcs. Every country offers its own rules about the usage of Freon. In most created countries, HCFC now is banned, while in some developing countries like China, still may use it until 2030, Indonesia may use it until foam extrusion 2040. But many countries are carrying out the new intend to increase the phasing out schedule of HCFCs. A very important factor I have to address is the fact that due to the poor solubility in polystyrene, CO2 cannot be utilized as blowing agent by itself; it must be used in combination with additional co-blowing agent like ethanol jointly, butane or DME etc. as solvent to help CO2 solve into the polystyrene.

Secondly, source availability. In some countries, some kinds of blowing realtors aren't available. For instance, in a few Middle East countries, ethanol isn't available and not permitted to import, and that means you have to use something else to be alternatives. And in some nationwide countries, hFCs are not available and not allowed to make use of also, aside from HCFCs. You must check with your authority to start to see the source availability.

Finally, local insulation standard. Almost every national country has its own standard of thermal conductivity of XPS panel. Let's consider China; the China national regular of thermal conductivity of XPS is certainly 0.030. On the other hand, some countries don't use thermal conductivity because the standard; they use thermal resistance R or value value instead. But so how exactly does the standard has something to do with your recipe of blowing agent? Associated with that using different blowing agent can result in different thermal conductivity. For example, by using HFCs or HCFCs, it is possible to control the lambda value below 0.029. If you use CO2 plus ethanol however, it is hard to help make the lambda worth under than 0.033. To obtain the lambda value below 0.030, some ongoing companies are employing the combination of HFC, Ethanol and co2.



The last issue, I'd like to talk about may be the relationship between thickness, hardness and the recipe of blowing agent. Using HCFCs or HFCs is easier to get width like 15cm. If you are using CO2 alone as the primary blowing agent, it would be very hard to obtain such thickness unless your collection can yield 1.5 ton per hour. But CO2 is normally advisable when you produce high compressive strength board like 1000kpa for particular make use of, because CO2 offers smaller cell quantity which is beneficial to get finer cell structure of the plank.