Is the era of employee performance reviews and rankings coming to an end?
Thats the question buzzing in the air this week after Accenture, one of the worlds largest companies, announced its decision to toss these nail-biting measures of employee success out the window.
Accenture CEO Pierre Nanterme told The Washington Post that starting in September, the performance of the companys 330,000 staffers will no longer be judged based on company rankings and annual evaluations. Instead, the professional services firm will implement a more fluid system, in which employees receive timely feedback from their managers on an ongoing basis following assignments.
All this terminology of rankings -- forcing rankings along some distribution curve or whatever -- were done with that, Nanterme said. Were going to evaluate you in your role, not vis vis someone else who might work in Washington, who might work in Bangalore. Its irrelevant. It should be about you.
Nantermeadded that this change will fundamentally, and dramatically, alter the companys performance management process.
Its huge, Nantermesaid. Were going to get rid of probably 90 percent of what we did in the past.
Accenture joins the ranks of several big-name companiesthat have, in recent years, done away with this source of employee stress.
The Post, citing data from management research firm CEB, reports that six percent of Fortune 500 companies have stopped using annual performance reviews and forced rankings.Microsoft, Adobe, Expediaand Motorolaare some of the companies that have recently overhauled their employee review system.
Some studies have shown that performance reviews and rankingsdont improve, and may actually hurt, performance.
The reality is that the traditional performance appraisal as practiced in the majority of organizations today is fundamentally flawed and incongruent with our values-based, vision-driven and collaborative work environments, Ray Williams, author of "The Leadership Edge,"wrote for Psychology Today last year.
Reviews and rankings have also been described as being too time-consuming, expensive and generally ineffective.
However, some companies and business consultants have defended the system. Victor Lipman, a retired Fortune 500 CEO, wrote in aForbes.com post that reviews and rankings can bring a sort ofdisciplined rigor to the management process.
Should companies get rid of performance reviews and rankings? Weigh in below.
Also on HuffPost:
This page contains materials from The Huffington Post and/or other third party writers. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ("PwC") has not selected or reviewed such third party content and it does not necessarily reflect the views of PwC. PwC does not endorse and is not affiliated with any such third party. The materials are provided for general information purposes only, should not be used as a substitute for consultation with professional advisors, and PwC shall have no liability or responsibility in connection therewith.