Now, there's certainly not something wrong with this, I just believe that writers who are doing this are missing out on potential traffic and/or clients. Such resource boxes will simply benefit their site rankings in a... This rousing linklicious.me paypal use with has several great suggestions for the inner workings of it.
I run an article service on my site, and I'm seeing a growing number of articles being submitted, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This is probably due to the growing variety of PLR articles and material that's becoming available.
Now, there's certainly not anything wrong with this, I just believe that authors who are doing this are passing up on possible traffic and/or clients. Such resource boxes will simply gain their site ratings in incoming links that are valued by any search engine. Clicking indexbear.com seemingly provides suggestions you can tell your mother.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they are losing out is as follows.
Much of the traffic to my report index comes from search engines, by people trying to find info on a specific subject. Now, this user types within their key-words, presses o-n the search field, and is given a list of relevant sites. They chose one, and are taken to the author's article. They browse the article about, say, snowboarding, feel 'This is interesting' and go to the author's source field at the end of-the article to see what else they've to say on this subject. For a different perspective, please consider glancing at: www.linklicious.me. There, they find a link to some site promotion mobile ringtones. Is the audience likely to be impressed, or interested in this? Not so likely. They wish to learn about snowboarding, maybe not personalize their phone. I believe one of three things will happen then:
The audience leaves the whole site in disgust.
The viewer clicks on the link to your relevant article.
The reader clicks on the relevant Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual promotion) ad.
They don't click the author's resource link. That's a possible client dropped, quite probably permanently.
Yes, put a link in to your website in the source box, but many article sites allow several links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s related to the article subject as well, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the client.
'But my site doesn't have any such thing related to that matter on it'!
You can add something that does. Include a report listing, and have the reference field saying 'To see more articles on this issue, click here.' Add a web service, and have the written text say 'To see links to websites with this subject, go here.' Or just visit ClickBank, look for related tasks, and have a link to them, together with the link saying something like 'If you prefer to learn more on this subject, buy this product.' Ultimately, not just a direct connect to the product, but a cloaked or redirected one.
By doing this, you still get that connect to your site that you were after formerly, but, additionally, you've the opportunity to earn money from the audience in a new way. A situation. If you have an opinion about the world, you will probably fancy to learn about linklicious fiverr. Plus, you do not appear to be someone only posting acquired material on any subject just for the benefit of the backlink it will give you. A more professional look. Isn't it worth taking the time to produce greater use of one's source box?.