Spammers And Junk Predators
I removed 145 spam threads using one of my websites today. Luckily I have moderate responses switched on so that they never actually get placed. That makes the spammers poor, but thats the worst trouble spammers have caused me.
However those that apparently are our Spam saviors. Those who say they're fighting spam have caused me more problems as opposed to spammers...
Sometimes I don't know which folks are the worst. Those that spam or those that say they're seeking spammers.
I wiped 145 junk posts using one of my blogs today. Fortuitously I've moderate responses switched on so they never really get placed. Which makes the spammers bad, but thats the worst inconvenience spammers have caused me.
Nevertheless those that allegedly are our Spam saviors. Those that say they're fighting spam have caused me more problems than the spammers them-selves.
Sorbs.net lists your domain name as a junk domain name if you are already located o-n or near the same IP address since the spammers. Therefore you are guilty by association.
To get your domain name eliminated from sorbs.net's list, you have to provide them money. Seems a lot like extortion since they personally add you to the number then ask you for money to be removed.
Then of course they tell you that they give the money to charity. I checked out the charity they say they provide the money to. It would go to a legal defense fund they could use to protect them-selves if you charged them. Some charity.
Twice today blogger.com has caused me spamconvenience. They have locked me from one of my own sites and one I control to get a consumer because their spambot said it could be spam. In addition it says that when you are a reading this message then of-course I'm not likely a spambot and they'll correct the situation.
They did this even though on that blog they need me to typ-e in to the little box whatever mad letters they have in the little graphic to produce each post on that same blog.
Half the time the little picture isn't even there. And that means you can't type the little letters into the field because the little letters don't exist. So how can they use that solution to make sure I'm not spamming, then flag it as a spam blog?
Nevertheless since I get paid to blog daily on the client's blog, my lack of income, that I am sure Google will not pay me for, is merely that lost income because of the junk practitioners.
They did this today towards the client's website. They're researching it they say. Like to note that website? Go to http://hotelsandapartments.blogspot.com It is not junk.
The very first time it happened was one-day after the blog was created by me. It'd just one post in it. Wow, just what a spammer I am. They blocked me from logging-in but sent a really nice e-mail to me, which I had not decided in for, saying they'd be happy to examine that weblog too. They even offered a link to where I could submit a form to obtain an assessment.
They sent me, when I used their good link in-the unsolicited e-mail, (maybe not junk), it asked me to log in using the username and password that THEY HAD ALREADY BLOCKED ME FROM USING!
In order that website must be re-built elsewhere. Again, I have had way more trouble from junk fighters than I ever have had from spammers. Effectively, thats all for my argument. Now I have to see if I can obtain the little image below to load so I can see what stupid letters I have to type into the field so you can see this post.. This thrilling visit my website paper has some prodound suggestions for the meaning behind it.