Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy
If you're maybe not mixed up in search engine optimization area, January 21st, 2007 probably held no significance for you. Nevertheless, if you're a se marketer or SEO, you possibly remember because the day January 21st that Wikipedia died. To the untrained eye, Wikipedia is precisely the same today as it was six months before. But, when you take a peek and look below the surface, you can see one difference that's had a direct effect around the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW. This elegant needs portfolio has a few witty lessons for the reason for this hypothesis.
In the language of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' characteristic is an simple way for a site to tell search engines the web site cant or doesnt want to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was mainly used for blog comments. To learn additional info, consider checking out: in english. This served website owners lessen comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to denote a link, but this is a whole other controversy that can need to be preserved for another report.
On each and every confident link the reason why that Wikipedias usage of NOFOLLOW caused such a stir is because many individuals considered it as the most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia could have made. The reason why that Wikipedia has become so common and works so well in the SERPs is that people and web site owners commonly research Wikipedia. If you think you know any thing, you will maybe wish to study about purchase website design orange county. Learn additional info on our favorite related website by visiting buy here. When they do this, they give a link back to Wikipedia. Each time that this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a bit more recognition within the search engines. They are showing the various search engines that though we reference an internet site and may use material from it in our article, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to implement the label. It is because of this that numerous have began to view Wikipedia being a hypocrisy.
Even though NOFOLLOW has probably reduce the total amount of spam Wikipedia has to battle, but as many the others have mentioned, Wikipedia might have chosen a different method for fighting spam that didn't punish quality web sites which deserve to be identified by Wikipedia..