Spam And spammers Predators

I deleted 145 spam posts on one of my blogs today. Luckily I've moderate comments turned on so they never really get placed. Identify new resources about kalatu review by browsing our poetic use with. Which makes the spammers poor, but thats the worst difficulty spammers have caused me.

Nevertheless those that allegedly are our Spam saviors. Those who say they're fighting spam have caused me more problems compared to the spammers...

Sometimes I don't know which individuals are the worst. Those that junk or those that say they are going after spammers.

I deleted 145 spam threads using one of my websites today. In the event people hate to get more about visit our site, we recommend many databases you should think about pursuing. Fortunately I've moderate responses turned on in order that they never really get posted. That produces the spammers poor, but thats the worst inconvenience spammers have caused me.

But those that allegedly are our Spam saviors. Those who say they are fighting spam have caused me more problems than the spammers themselves. provides your domain name as a junk domain name if you are actually published o-n or near the same IP-ADDRESS while the spammers. Therefore you're guilty by association.

To really get your domain name eliminated away from's list, you've to provide them money. Seems a good deal like extortion since they personally add you to the record then ask you for money to be eliminated.

Then obviously they tell you that they give the money to charity. I examined the charity they say they provide the money to. It would go to a legal defense fund they might use to protect them-selves if they were sued by you. To get one more interpretation, please consider checking out: blogging network. Some charity.

Twice now has caused me spamconvenience. Because their spambot said it may be junk they've locked me out of one of my very own blogs and one I handle to get a client. For one more way of interpreting this, we recommend people check-out: sponsor. It also says that when you're a reading this information then of course I am unlikely a spambot and they will correct the problem.

They did this even though on that blog they need me to typ-e into the little box whatever mad letters they have in the little image to produce each post on that same blog.

Half the time the tiny picture is not even there. So that you cannot type the little letters in-to the box as the little letters do not occur. So just how can they use that approach to ensure I'm not spamming, then flag it as a spam website?

But since I receive money to blog daily on the client's blog, my loss in income, that I am sure Google won't reimburse me for, is simply that lost income as a result of spam competitors.

They did this today to the client's blog. They're reviewing it they say. Like to note that website? Go-to It's not spam.

Initially it happened was one-day after the blog was created by me. It'd just one post in it. Wow, just what a spammer I am. They blocked me from logging in but sent a very nice mail to me, which I had not chosen in for, saying they would be happy to review that weblog also. They even provided a link to where I could fill out a form to obtain an assessment.

They sent me, when I followed their good link in-the unwanted e-mail, (not junk), it asked me to log in using the user-name and password that THEY'D ALREADY BLOCKED ME FROM USING!

To ensure that website had to be re-built elsewhere. Again, I have had a lot more trouble from spam fighters than I actually have had from spammers. Well, thats all for my observation. Now I've to see if I can get the little image below to load so I can see what silly letters I have to type in-to the field so you can see this post..