Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy
If you're not active in the search engine marketing community, January 21st, 2007 probably held no significance for you. But, if you are a search engine marketer or SEO, you possibly remember January 21st because the time that Wikipedia died. Get further on jeepstreet49's blog by visiting our disturbing article. For the untrained eye, Wikipedia is exactly the exact same today as it had been half a year before. But, when you take a peek and look below the surface, you can see one difference that's had a direct effect around the world of se optimization: NOFOLLOW.
In the words of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' capability is an easy way for a site to tell search-engines that the web site cant or doesnt need to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. That served weblog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this is a whole other conflict which will need to be stored for an alternative article.
The reason why that Wikipedias ownership of NOFOLLOW on each and every outgoing link caused many people viewed it as one of the most hypocritical decision that Wikipedia may have made such a mix is. The reason that Wikipedia is becoming so common and works so well in the SERPs is that web site owners and people frequently guide Wikipedia. Www.Espn.Go.Com/Video/Clip?Id=11918976 is a striking online library for further concerning the purpose of it. When they do this, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. Everytime that this process occurs, Wikipedia gets a tad bit more acceptance in the search-engines. They're showing the search engines that even though we guide a web site and may use information from it within our report, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to apply the tag. Learn further on our favorite related use with - Visit this web page: Fully Booked -. It's for this reason that lots of have began to view Wikipedia as a huge hypocrisy. In the event people require to identify more on link, we know of heaps of resources people could pursue.
Wikipedia might have chosen another method for fighting spam that did not punish quality web sites which deserve to be acknowledged by Wikipedia, though NOFOLLOW has probably cut down on the total amount of spam Wikipedia has to fight, but as many others have mentioned..