Why FFA Submissions and Link Village Certainly are a Bad Idea
Before search engines got wise, a site's site standing was according to keyword match-ups. This riveting BookCrossing - blowsudan43's Bookshelf article has assorted salient lessons for where to look at it. When webmasters stock-piled their sites with key-words, the incorrect sites were getting too much attention. For more information, consider looking at: link emperor. Google chose to give attention to a site's 'popularity' instead. The number of incoming links became the focus of PR conditions. The idea behind this technique was that if a lot of sites connect to yet another site, that site could contain useful content. But again, webmasters got sly. With this tendency, we began to see the development of 'Link Farms' and 'Free-for-All' (FFA) web sites. These pages were essentially a gigantic collection of (quite often) useless links. Typically, the internet sites weren't labeled or detailed. Visiting link emporor certainly provides cautions you might tell your mom. They became a spot for webmasters to dump their links in order to make their site seem popular. This strategy worked for a while, but soon search-engines caught on. 'Link Farms' and FFA sites served no purpose to users. Because Google prides it self o-n catering to users (and PERHAPS not designers), an answer had to be formed. 'Link Farms' were cluttering up the internet and rendering it more difficult for customers to locate useful resources on the web. Google soon begun to rate the standard of the links that determined a site's 'link pop.' 'Link Farms' and FFA internet sites became labeled as junk, and ergo added no value into a site's link popularity. Today, submitting to some 'Link Farm' or FFA site could be damaging to your website's name. Google takes a strong stance against most of these link pages. At best, the 'Link Farm' will move down your ranking and allow it to be harder for the important internet sites to work in your favor. At worst, your site will soon be BARRED altogether for using spam sites to try and create traffic. It is a very real possibility. 'Link Farms' and FFA internet sites provide hardly any value. Quality or relevant links will not be obtained by users from your distribution, although it may seem tempting. Plus, who wants to see their link among 'trash' websites for adult activity, internet dating sites, and casinos? Publishing to 'Link Farms' doesn't subscribe to your standing and is simply not worth the risk. As an alternative, spend your time submitting to legitimate directories and trading links with other related sites. The process can be time-consuming, however it is the only way to build secure, site-specific traffic. For an easier approach to the boring directory submission process, and to Submit your website to 300+ link websites easy and fast Directory Submitter is recommended by us..