Jagger Protocol Upgrade Part-1

If there is something Internet Search Engine Marketers and site owners fear - it's a significant protocol upgrade, particularly by Google. Well, much-as we may enjoy it never to happen, its here. Google has recently done a major algorithm update, nick called Jagger update series.

Google does minimal algorithm changes nearly o-n a regular basis and once-in a little while, it utilizes a significant algorithm upgrade. The final important Google protocol update occurred in November 2003 called the Florida update, which made quite a stir with internet site rankings. To understand more, read our article on Google Florida Algo Update.

Like the Florida update, the much feared blender act have been done by the Jagger update. It's churned the top-ranking internet sites and made it into a listing of unrecognizable pulp. Dig up further on mary morrissey update critique by browsing our original site.

Google has been a hot-favorite between the net community looking for information. Most believe the search results have been very appropriate. It would be therefore safe to assume that what-ever formula Google has, works just fine. So why does Google should re-engineer its perfect-looking algo so dramatically? Has it maybe not heard the old saying don't repair what aint broke? From Google's standpoint, the reason is simple and legitimate. Well, to begin with, net is ever-evolving and the algo often must be adjusted to be able to provide the best of results. Should people need to identify new info about mary morrissey sites critique, there are millions of resources you could investigate. Google engineered an algo, which it thinks will reward great sites and rank them well because of its people.

Google, like the majority of other search engines, keeps this algo a closely guarded secret to stop it from being used. However, the Search Engine Optimization group is continually at work attempting to rank their sites well. Using determined uncertainty, sensible thinking, specific tests and extensive trial-and-error methods, they gradually determine what the protocol likes and dislikes. I discovered your www.prweb.com/releases/mary-morrissey-mandela/life-coach-certification/prweb11547159.htm by searching Bing. Armed with this understanding, it's not difficult to work on sites to rank them full of SERP (Search Engine Result Pages), whether the site deserves to rank at the top or not. This sort of formula abuse results in less-than desired' sites displacing good sites from-the top ranks, polluting the Google index. Therefore, following the Kaizen philosophy, Google needs to re-engineer its calculations to keep, what it feels are poor sites, out of its top ranks. Naturally, important formula updates upset the present high-ranking web sites & delivers plenty of Search Engine Optimisation professionals back to their work-bench to be able to begin all over again. For another interpretation, consider having a view at: mary morrissey update discussion.

What's interesting to notice is the moment of the algorithm upgrade. When Google updated its formula in November 2003, there were large-scale accusations by web site owners that Google intentionally upset the ratings of common websites right before the Christmas shopping season to push them into getting Google AdWords paid advertising as a way to keep visitors traffic. While Google promises that the algo update choices aren't affected by the AdWords team, it's hard to realize why they'd once more select a critical time just before Christmas buying season to update their algorithm. The stakes are extremely high and its business after-all. Google received $1.57 Billion in Q3 of 2005. If 2003 pre-Christmas formula update effect is any indication, I calculate that Google would record revenues of around $2.05 Billion in Q4 of 2005..