Why Might It Be That We All Cannot Create Fuel-Efficient Vehicles? abc
Around one third of new car purchasers in America thought of fuel economy an important factor.. Due to the preoccupation today with pollution, global warming and America's dependence on overseas sources of oil, it's actually shocking to learn that as long ago as 1992 a car that got 100 miles to the gallon was built by General Motors. An additional car, oil change nashville , which looked a lot like the Geo Metro, weighed only 1000 pounds and could get 75 miles per gallon. However, in order to meet American safety regulations, the 3-cylinder vehicle required reinforcement weighing 200 pounds, which ended in further development being discarded.
It really is rather shocking that this had not been the only GM prototype that was built, only to be thrown out later. The GM Lean Machine of 1982, which could achieve 80 mpg, along with the GM Ultralite which achieved a fabulous 100 mpg, were two of these vehicles. GM seemed to be offering cars to the purchasing public in 1992 that did 20 mpg, while Honda was getting 50 mpg with their Civic VX, but right then GM already covertly had oil change guide doing 100 miles per gallon. Given that cars have already been developed that get 100 miles per gallon, then why are they not being offered to the general public?
What makes traditional vehicles sold in the US, while at the same time, the same vendors are selling different vehicles far away in other countries? Vehicles that achieve more than 70 mpg have been sold in Europe and Japan for a number of years. A case in point of a car never offered in the US and capable of 78 mpg, is the Lupo by Volkswagen. A car known as the Jazz elsewhere in the world was brought to the States in 2007 as the Fit. The Jazz in Japan has ways to increase fuel economy and a smaller engine, but for the US, the Fit doesn't even contain a smaller engine as an option.
In The United States the manufacturers say they have to build big cars mainly because that is what the American public wants. It's apparent that manufacturers don't generate a lot of money selling a small 2-person commuter vehicle, but they certainly do selling big SUVs. Commercials have convinced the citizens of the US that Tanks on Wheels are an absolute must to have. Because options have never been provided reveals where the big companies have their interests. The leader in fuel economy could have been General Motors, but they prefer to be the leader in SUVs instead. Many other manufacturers in addition have developed fuel-efficient cars, but they've all ended up the same as GM by not offering them to Americans.
We all live in a world that has waged wars over oil, that has been polluted, and car makers have never even given the choice to people in this country of fuel-efficient cars. The question comes up: how many Americans could have appreciated the option of getting a car with good gas mileage but weren't ever offered it? Perhaps it is time to get those previous plans back out and build a vehicle that has already been built before.