Now, there is certainly not something wrong with this, I only believe that authors who are doing this are missing potential traffic and/or customers. Such source boxes will only gain their site rankings in a...
I run an article service on my site, and I am seeing an increasing quantity of articles being submitted, only for the backlink provided in the Resource Box. This is probably as a result of growing amount of PLR articles and material that is becoming available.
Today, there's certainly not anything wrong with this, I only think that writers who are doing this are passing up on potential traffic and/or clients. Such reference boxes will only gain their site rankings in any internet search engine that values incoming links.
Is this a bad thing? No. Where they're losing out is as follows.
Much of the traffic to my post index comes from search engines, by people trying to find information on a specific subject. Today, this user types within their keywords, clicks on the search field, and is given a list of relevant sites. Click here linklicious backlinks to study why to look at it. They selected one, and are taken up to the author's article. Dig up more on an affiliated article - Navigate to this web site: linklicious basic. They read the article about, say, snowboarding, think 'This is interesting' and go to the author's resource box at the conclusion of the article to see what else they've to say on this issue. There, they locate a link to a site marketing cellular ringers. Is the audience likely to be impressed, or thinking about this? Not so likely. They would like to find out about snowboarding, maybe not personalize their phone. In my opinion among three things will happen then:
The reader leaves the whole site in disgust.
The reader clicks on the link to a related report.
The reader clicks on a relevant Google Ad-sense (or similar contextual marketing) ad.
They do not click the author's resource link. That is a possible client lost, quite probably permanently.
Yes, put a link in to your website in the reference box, but most article directories let many links, therefore for goodness sake put a link in that' ;s related to the article subject as well, and preferably put it in first, before you lose the consumer.
'But my site does not have such a thing regarding that subject onto it'!
You can add a thing that does. Add an article service, and have the source box saying 'To see more articles on this subject, click here.' Add a web service, and have the text say 'To see links to internet sites with this issue, go here.' Or simply head to ClickBank, look for related tasks, and have a link to them, with the link saying something like 'If you want to learn more on this subject, purchase this product.' Ideally, not just a direct link to the item, but a cloaked or redirected one. To check up more, we understand you have a gaze at: linklicious vs nuclear link crawler.
Using this method, you still get that link to your website that you were after formerly, but, furthermore, you have the opportunity to earn money from your audience in a brand new way. A situation. Plus, you do not appear to be somebody only posting acquired content on any matter just for the benefit of the backlink it'll give you. A more professional look. Is not it worth finding the time to make better use of one's resource field?. Linklicious includes additional info about the reason for it.